I don’t KNOW that there is anything inherently wrong with the site. I am not familiar with its EXACT location or the size. I am INCENSED that the BOE thinks they ought to steal it from Prestera. I think that it is probably too close to Prestera, to Rte. 60, and to what my MeMe calls “titty bars”. I want to know where the money came from that the BOE was going to spend on this property if they had won the bid process (or, alternatively, might be paying to Prestera with the eminent domain seizure of the property since BOE lost the bid), since last January the BOE said they did NOT have any money to purchase property and that was why the ONLY property that would work would be by the Vo-Tec. Smith said in one of the articles, the BOE could have bid higher than the $1.9 million. I thought there was no money to purchase property??
See article in HD about the eminent domain thing. http://www.herald-dispatch.com/news/x181484999/BOE-votes-to-take-land-from-Prestera/index.html?show=all Look on the sidebar for related articles for the history on the property and the bids and BOE interest.
I have heard/read Mike O’Dell (operations director for the BOE) say that the Memorial Fieldhouse property wouldn’t be funded by the SBA. I thought they were trying to say that there was something about the site that did not fit the regulations or Policy 6200. I emailed the BOE today to ask about this. Apparently it is all down to the cost. Again. See more at a different article in the HD.
But, the claim (by Superintendent Bill Smith by email to me) is that there is too much traffic by the Field House (granted, but could we not ameliorate that in some way–say, a big fence and a pedestrian walkway over the road?), that the demolition is expected to be over $2.5 million (how much will the demolition of University Heights cost?, after we pay “fair market value” and take it by eminent domain from Prestera), that the drainage is bad and cannot be handled by the city, so there needs to be big holding tanks & buffer system underground for that (the second HD article says $375,000 for that). And, I’m afraid that we’ve forgotten what was said at the “Community Meeting” last January by Charles Holley who works for the city of Huntington — their experience is that they spend (if gutting an old, strong, historic building and rebuilding all the guts to be up to code) one-third less than building from scratch. I refer you also to a “comment” from the HD that is unattributed but sounds like they might know something from last January’s blog post. And it is likely we could get the main part of the Memorial Field House for free from the Park District. We would need to purchase some surrounding property. So, take THAT by eminent domain. Sheesh. Did we only notice how wonderful the University Height property was when someone else wanted it? Could we get someone to come up with a great plan for the Memorial Field House so that the BOE would want IT? I know the Enslow and Highlawn parents would be happier. I don’t know about all the people who are still ticked off about the last bond for the high schools, which resulted in the BOE offices occupying the old Huntington East High, instead of a consolidated Enslow/Beverly Hills middle school (does this sound familiar?)?
See? I’m still confused about having the University Heights property is really saving any money.
Save
Email
Print
Children Get a Dose of College Experience